IoT + geolocation · Mining & industry

Geolocated alerts for critical operations: warnings that arrive with the phone locked

In a mining or hydrocarbons operation, a risk event — a lightning storm, an incident — affects one zone, not the whole operation. The question that saves lives is individual: is it me who needs to seek shelter? We built an alert system that answers that question and gets through even when the phone is locked.

Industrial · Mining · Oil & GasIn pilot with real users

Problem

Personnel in critical operations cannot tell whether a risk event — lightning storm, incident — actually affects them.

Result

Zone-based alerts that ring with the app closed and the phone locked. Designed for privacy.

The context

The usual channels — group chat, email, radio — have two failures in an emergency: they cannot tell who it applies to (everyone receives everything, and excess warnings train people to ignore them), and they do not break through a silenced phone inside a pocket.

Moreover, the obvious solution — tracking every worker’s location — collides with something legitimate: nobody wants to be surveilled. The system had to resolve the tension between alerting by location and becoming a surveillance tool.

How it works

The platform receives events from professional weather sources and IoT sensors in the field, decides which zones are at risk, and fires critical notifications — the kind that ring with the app closed and the phone locked or silenced — only to the people whose zone is affected.

Privacy is by design, not by policy: location is used solely to decide whether the alert applies to you, and no movement histories are built. The system knows who to alert without becoming a tracker.

Engineering decisions

Decision 01

Critical alerts, not just more notifications

We use the phone operating system’s critical alert channels — the same ones used by emergency alerts — so the warning rings with the device locked or silenced. A safety alert that depends on the user having the app open is not an alert.

Decision 02

Privacy as an engineering requirement

Location decides the alert and nothing else: no histories, no surveillance. That decision is not just ethical — it is what makes workers willing to carry the system, and without adoption there is no safety.

Decision 03

Failover in everything that can fail

Redundant data sources, automatic fallback between AI models, and infrastructure built to run 24/7. A safety system has a different contract from any other application: it cannot have a bad day.

What changes for the business

For an operation with field personnel, this turns reactive safety into anticipation: the right person gets the right warning with minutes of advantage — and those not at risk receive no noise training them to ignore the next alert.

  • The warning arrives even with the phone locked, silenced, or the app closed.
  • Only people in the affected zone are alerted: zero alarm fatigue.
  • Privacy by design: location-based alerts without surveilling people.
  • Continuous 24/7 operation with redundancy in data, models and infrastructure.

Where else it applies

Mining

Lightning storms, heavy equipment traffic, zone evacuations.

Oil & Gas

Incidents at facilities with distributed personnel.

Construction

Weather risks across large sites.

Agroindustry

Field personnel facing severe weather events.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about this case

Does the alert really ring with the phone on silent?

Yes — it uses the operating system’s critical notification channels, the same as emergency alerts. That was a design requirement from day one: a closed app and a locked phone are the normal case, not the exception.

Does the system track workers?

No. Location is used only to decide whether an alert applies, and no movement histories are stored. The design separates "knowing who to alert" from "knowing where everyone has been" — it only does the former.

What if the data source or the AI provider fails?

There is redundancy at all three layers: alternative data sources, automatic model failover, and infrastructure monitored 24/7. A safety system is designed assuming its parts will fail.

Does it work in operations without full cellular coverage?

The system combines channels: where there is data coverage it reaches the phone, and it can integrate with the operation’s local means (sirens, radio) for uncovered zones. The zone architecture is the same.

Have a similar challenge?

Tell us your problem. We'll tell you how to solve it — and how long it takes.